| HOME PAGE | SITE INDEX | CONNEXIONS INDEX | AUTO-BIOGRAPHY |
![]() |
What's in a name? | Why was Uno so called? What do the letters HPE stand for? And how do other manufacturers choose names for their cars? Find out below. |
| Fiat/Bertone X1/9 | Fiat Uno | Lancia HPE | Vanden Plas Princess | Nissan Prairie |
| Mercedes A-class | Naming themes |
Coming soon... |
Ford Cortina |
Toyota Corolla |
| Fiat/Bertone X1/9 | BACK TO TOP | |
In the mid-1960s, Fiat's head of design, Dante Giacosa, adopted a new numbering series for development projects: the X0 series was applied to engines, X1 to cars and X2 to trucks. The X prefix was chosen to impart a sense of mystery and anonymity, considered important in keeping these projects secret not only from from the outside world, but also from bean counters within Fiat! Rod Shimwell (in his 1977 book, "FIAT", from the Great Cars series), states that the X stood for experimental, although Giacosa himself merely acknowledges the idea of using X as having originated with the general manager of Zastava, the Yugoslav Fiat off-shoot. Either way, the first car to be developed under this scheme was, of course, code-named X1/1.
X1/1 was lauched in 1969 as the Fiat 128, and was to form the basis for a mid-engined sports car, code-named X1/9, to replace the Fiat 850 Spyder. It appears that this name was seen as having a certain cachet, as the car was launched as the X1/9 in 1972, thus becoming the only car from the X1 series to retain its development name in the marketplace. So when is a Fiat X1/9 not a Fiat X1/9? When it's a Bertone X1/9. The Bertone company (see panel, right) had been responsible for the design of the X1/9, and for constructing the bodyshells, which were then passed to Fiat for final assembly. When, in 1982, Fiat decided to cease production of the X1/9, Bertone felt that there was still a viable market for the car, and thus began manufacturing it themselves, alongside the Fiat Strada/Ritmo Cabriolet and, later that decade, the convertible versions of the Vauxhall Astra/Opel Kadett. The X1/9 was relaunched in 1983, and reached the UK as the Bertone X1/9 VS (version speciale), with two-tone paintwork and a leather-trimmed seats and door panels. As an aside, it's a little-known fact that the X1/9 had a close namesake in the French Panhard X19 of 1912, which admittedly had little else in common with the Fiat. |
|
| Fiat Uno | BACK TO TOP | |
Like the X1/9 before it, the Uno was a Fiat which was launched with its development code-name (or at least part of it) attached firmly to its boot-lid. The Uno spearheaded a major development programme within the Fiat group, and as such, was developed under the code-name of Tipo Uno, or Type 1. While this may sound a little prosaic, it could be sign that Fiat had taken to heart the gentle ribbing it received for developing the Panda under the code-name Rustica, a name which can surely have had purely bucolic overtones only in Italy.
In fact, the Panda had originally been labelled Tipo Zero, indicating a blank-sheet design, and the launch of Tipo Uno was to be followed by that of Tipo Quattro (Type 4), Tipo Due (Type 2) and Tipo Tre (Type 3), in that order. Incidentally, Fiat's naming policy for these models was a little quirky: while Tipo Uno had been launched as the Uno, Tipo Due was launched simply as the Tipo. As if deliberately to confuse the issue, the Tipo Quattro was a joint development programme with Alfa Romeo and Saab (providing the 164 and 9000 respectively, in addition to the Fiat Croma and Lancia Thema), thus leading many observers to assume that the "Quattro" referred to the four marques involved. Bearing in mind the amount of effort that car companies put into ensuring that their model names do not have any derogatory connotations in various languages, it’s a wonder that something sounding suspiciously like "Ooh, no!" in English-speaking markets got through at all. Then again, most people I encountered insisted that my car was a "You know", so perhaps it wasn't such an issue after all. Mind you, such considerations didn't stop Fiat from launching the Punto in 1993; punto is Italian for point, implying a sharp car (for sharp people?). Trouble is, it can also mean period, or full stop - not an ideal name for a car! This rather calls to mind Chevrolet's decision not to market it's Nova under that name in South America when it was pointed out that no va translates as "doesn't go". If nothing else, the Uno's name was to prove prescient, as the car quickly snapped up first place in the 1984 Car of the Year competition (one of the most controversial decisions in the award's history), and went on to dominate the Italian and European sales charts for the remainder of the 1980s. The name also found expression in the Uno's tendency to be equipped with only one of various items which on most cars would come in pairs (windscreen wiper, washer jet nozzle, hatch-lifting strut, steering column stalk). Only a hardened cynic would believe that this inspired design philosophy could possibly have had anything to do with cost-saving. |
|
|||||||||||||||
| Lancia HPE | BACK TO TOP | |
At the time of its launch in 1975 as part of the Lancia Beta range, the letters HPE stood for High Performance Estate. As such, this was the first (and, until recently, only) estate car built in-house by Lancia - what others there were having been converted from saloons by external coachbuilding firms. But is the HPE really an estate car, or is it in fact a fastback coupé with a rear hatch, in the style of the MGB GT, Reliant Scimitar, Volvo 1800ES and BMW 2002 Touring, all of which preceeded it? It's a moot point, but of these cars, only the Lancia's hatch reached down to bumper level, in true estate-car style. For that matter, with a top speed of just 116mph and a 0-60 time of over 10 seconds (for the original 2.0 version), even the "High Performance" part of the designation was a little dubious. As the HPE neared the end of its production run, Lancia seemed dissatisfied with the "Estate" designation, and decided to market the cars instead as the High Performance Executive, perhaps in the hope that such people would buy them... Production of the Beta HPE ceased in 1985. However, it is still possible to buy a new 'HPE', as Lancia revived the name on the second-generation Delta, launched in 1992. |
Lancia Born in 1881, Vincenzo Lancia had been working for a small Turin-based workshop called Welleyes, when it was annexed by the newly-formed Fiat in 1900. Lancia, still only 19, was made head of inspection for the new Fiat factory. When Claudio Fogolin joined the company two years later as an inspector, he and Lancia formed a strong friendship, eventually leading to their decision to set up their own automobile company. Lancia & Co. was founded in Turin towards the end of 1906 by Lancia and Fogolin, and the company began producing cars the following year. Over the years, Lancia gained a reputation for quality, innovation and sporting prowess. However, in 1969, the company faced bankruptcy and was bought by Fiat. |
|
| Vanden Plas Princess | BACK TO TOP | |
The Princess name can be traced back to Austin in the immediate post-war period. Although famed for its small cars, in particular the legendary Austin 7 (or Baby Austin), Austin also had a tradition in building large cars and limousines for the carriage trade. In 1946, the coachbuilding firm of Vanden Plas (see panel, below right) became a subsidiary of Austin as part of an arrangement whereby the former would build a top-of-the-range saloon on the latter's new six-cylinder chassis. This car was launched the following year as the Austin Princess A120, later to become the A135 with an increase in engine size.
In 1952, Austin was merged with Morris (who already owned Wolseley, Riley and MG) to form the nationalised British Motor Corporation (BMC). Later that decade, BMC began its practice of passing production models over to Vanden Plas for upmarket re-trimming, and the Princess name seemed to stick, being applied to almost all such models (with the exception of the 1959 Austin A105 Vanden Plas). Thus, by the mid-1960s, Vanden Plas's range comprised the Princess 1100, Princess 3-litre (based on the Pinifarina-styled Austin A110) and the Princess 4-litre R (similar to the 3-litre, but with a larger, ex-Rolls Royce engine), in addition to the Princess IV DS7 limousine (successor to the original Princess) which often saw service at weddings and funerals. The 1100/1300 model was to be the last Vanden Plas model to carry the Princess name; its 1974 replacement, based on the Austin Allegro, was known simply as the Vanden Plas 1500. It appears that BL had other plans for the name (see below) which necessitated its removal from the Vanden Plas domain. The 1100 range had been developed under the code name ADO16 (ADO standing for Austin Design Office, although after the formation of BMC, Morris diehards insisted it stood for Amalgamated Design Office), and launched in 1962 as the Morris 1100. The story of how the Vanden Plas Princess version came about can be found elsewhere on this site, but by the mid-1960s the 1100 range was also being sold under BMC's other marque names: Austin, Wolseley, MG and Riley (as the Kestrel). BMC's seemingly curious policy of "badge-engineering" was actually a means of managing the fact that it had inherited a great many individal-marque dealerships, each of which had a customer base loyal to that particular marque. Rather than taking the bull by the horns, and selecting one company-wide marque name (as was to happen much later with the Rover name), it was decided (perhaps wisely, at the time) to make mildly-altered versions of the same car to suit each marque's customers. Additionaly, several re-bodied versions of the car were produced overseas. In 1966, BMC merged with Jaguar (including Daimler), forming British Motor Holdings (BMH). Two years later, BMH was merged with the Leyland Motor Corporation (which included Rover, Land Rover, Triumph and a whole range of commercial vehicle manufacturers), forming the mammoth British Leyland Motor Corporation, or BL for short. The Princess name re-emerged a couple of years after the demise of the Vanden Plas Princess 1300, in an attempt to sort out the muddle which had arisen following the 1975 launch of the wedge-shaped 18-22 series in Austin, Morris and Wolseley versions. Within six months it had (sensibly) been decided to market the 18-22 series under a single name - Princess. This sounded the death knell for the Wolseley marque, along with the old BMC practice of rampant badge-engineering. However, despite BL's intention that this time round, Princess should be seen as a marque in itself, the new car was invariably referred to as the Austin Princess, perhaps because the name was still familiar from the days of the original A120/135. During the 1980s, BL underwent sevral phases of rationalisation. Having already dropped the Riley (1969) and Wolseley (1975) marques, Vanden Plas and MG were the next to go with the closure of the Kingsbury (1979) and Abingdon (1980) factories. BL was then re-organised into two distinct groups: Austin-Morris and Jaguar-Rover-Triumph. In 1982, the MG and Vanden Plas names were revived to denote sporting and luxury versions of the Metro (and were later used on other models). Morris was next disappear, in 1984, by which time the only Triumph being made was the Acclaim, a re-badged Honda Ballade (Civic saloon). In 1985, the Triumph marque disappeared when the Acclaim's replacement was launched as a Rover. The following year, Jaguar/Daimler was privatised, with the rights to the Vanden Plas name included in the deal. What was left of the former BL now became the Austin-Rover Group (ARG). This group was bought by British Aerospace (BAe), before finally being rebranded simply as Rover (though retaining ownership of the remaining redundant marques), and sold to BMW in 1993. This led to speculation that various marque names (such as Riley and Austin-Healey) might be revived, as BMW's then-CEO, Bernd Pischetsrieder (nephew of Alec Issigonis, who engineered and/or designed the Morris Minor 1000, Mini and 1100), was a confirmed anglophile with a strong sentimental attachment to these names. However, following the ousting of Pischetsrieder from the BMW board in February 1999, this now looks less likely. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| Nissan Prairie | BACK TO TOP | |
The name Prairie calls to mind images of the wide open spaces of the American plains. What could be more appropriate for a car designed with optimum interior space in mind. There may also have been an implied reference to the wide open space provided by the lack of a pillar separating the front and rear doors, although the currency of this particular association was lost with the introduction of the Mk 2 model.
Oddly enough, when launched in America, where the name would surely have been most-readily recognised, the car was known not as the Prairie, but as the Stanza Wagon. It should be noted that Datsun/Nissan's worldwide model naming policy (in common with those of various other Japanese manufacturers) is frequently chaotic. For instance, the Stanza name was also used in the UK, but for a completely different, 5-door hatchback sold in the early 1980s; this car was in turn marketed elsewhere as the Violet, the Auster or the Liberta! |
Nissan The name Nissan is derived from Nihon Sangyo Co., one of two companies which joined in 1933 to form the Nissan Motor Company. The other company, Tobata Imono Co., had absorbed the DAT Automobile Manufacturing Co., whose origins can in turn be traced back to the formation in 1911 of the Kwaishinsha Co., makers of the DAT (meaning hare in Japanese) car. By the time of the merger, Tobata were building a car called the Datson (literally, son of DAT). The name was later changed to Datsun, because Datson sounded like the Japanese word for ruin. |
|
| Mercedes A-class | BACK TO TOP | |
Mercedes had been considering the virtues of having a small car in its range for around 20 years when, in 1993, it relased the Vision A concept car. The significance of the A designation was simply that this car would be positioned on the first rung of the ladder in the Mercedes range. Over the following years, the concept car was developed and honed into the der Klasse-A (A-class), launched in 1997 with a variety of engines - A140 (1.4 litre petrol), A160 (1.6 litre petrol & diesel) & A170 (1.7 litre diesel) - alongside the existing Mercedes models: C-class (Compact), E-class (Executive) S-class (Super), G-class (Geländewagen, a sort of German Land Rover) and M-class (Muddy - no, only kidding; when did you last see a muddy M-class? It actually stands for Mobility). Prior to the introduction of these clear class designations, Mercedes cars had been known by an often-bewildering and increasingly meaningless combination of numbers and letters. This naming scheme started out quite logically, with the numbers indicating the engine size and the letters the body style (eg: the 500SL was a 5-litre Sports Lightweight; the 300D was a 3-litre Diesel). However, when the first "small Mercedes" was launched in 1983 with a 2.0 engine, there was already a 200 model in Mercedes' next range up. It was was decided to call all models in the new range "190", regardless of engine size, and thus the old pattern was comprehensively broken. Mercedes saloons have traditionally been officially identified by a W (wagen, or "car") number, and the A-class is no exception: in Mercedes-speak, it's the W168. |
Mercedes-Benz Mercedes-Benz is the car division of DaimlerChrysler, formerly Daimler-Benz. Diamler-Benz was formed in 1926 by the merger of the companies founded independently by Gottlieb Daimler and Karl Benz in the late 1880s. It is thought that the two men never met, and when Daimler died in 1900, he left his factory to his two sons and colleague Wilhelm Maybach. Emil Jellinek, the Daimler agent in Nice at the turn of the century, decided to re-name the cars, as Germanic-sounding names were unpopular in France at the time for political reasons. He used his daughter's name, Mercédès, and the name Mercedes-Benz has appeared on the company's cars ever since the 1926 merger. Mercedes will soon revive the Maybach name for its new super-luxury model. |
|
| Naming themes | BACK TO TOP | |
Naming new cars these days is a very lucrative business. Manufacturers employ the services of specialist market research and brand identity companies to find names which will "work" in each of the global markets where the car is to be sold. This can sometimes be a tricky business: Toyota had to think twice about selling the MR2 in France, as when pronounced, the name sounded suspiciously like merde; likewise, the Rolls Royce Silver Mist never saw the light of day due to the name's, erm, methanic overtones in Germany. Below, I've listed some of the more popular themes for car names, and given examples of how they have been applied by various manufacturers. The list is by no means comprehensive (let me know if you have any worthy additions), and inevitably, some of the names could easily fit into more than one category. |
|
|
| Acknowledgments | BACK TO TOP | |
The following books have proved a valuable source of reference in compiling the above information. Thanks also to "CarorVan" for e-mailing me some suggestions, which have now been incorporated. |
||
| Title | Author(s) | Publisher | Date | ISBN | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forty Years of Design with Fiat | Dante Giacosa | Automobilia | 1979 | n/a | |
| Fiat Pocket History | Ferruccio Bernabò | Libreria dell'Automobile | 1981 | 88 85058 05 1 | |
| Fiat | Rod Shimwell | William Luscombe | 1977 | 0 86002 140 8 | |
| The Automotive Art of Bertone | Rob de la Rive Box, Richard Crump | Haynes | 1984 | 0 85429 349 3 | |
| Fiat X1/9 Collector's Guide | Phil Ward | Motor Racing Publications | 1994 | 0 947981 83 7 | |
| Lancia Beta Collector's Guide | Brian Long | Motor Racing Publications | 1991 | 0 947981 62 4 | |
| The Complete Book of Lancia | Ferruccio Bernabò | Libreria dell'Automobile | 1980 | n/a | |
| Vanden Plas - Coachbuilders | Brian Smith | Dalton Watson | 1979 | 901465 427 | |
| The Cars of BMC | Graham Robson | Motor Racing Publications | 1987 | 0 947981 14 4 | |
| Complete Catalogue of Austin Cars | Anders Ditlev Clausager | Bayview Books | 1992 | 1 870979 26 5 | |
| Complete History of the Japanese Car | Marco Ruiz | Haynes / Foulis | 1988 | 0 85429 672 7 | |
| Form: Mercedes-Benz | Bruno Alfieri | Automobilia | 1995 | 88 7960 080 X | |
| Pictorial History of Australian Automobiles | Andrew Clarke | Bison Group | 1989 | 0 86124 524 5 | |
| Aussie Cars | Tony Davis | Marque Publishing | 1987 | 0 94079 01 7 | |
| Lamborghini Urraco & the V8s | Jean-François Marchet | Osprey AutoHistory | 1983 | 0 85429 672 7 | |
| Encyclopaedia of Autombiles | Enzo Angelucci | Hamlyn/Odhams | 1967 | n/a | |
| A-Z of Cars of the 1920s | Nick Baldwin | Bayview Books | 1994 | 1 870979 53 2 | |
| A-Z of Cars of the 1930s | Michael Sedgwick, Mark Gillies | Bayview Books | 1993 | 1 870979 38 9 | |
| A-Z of Cars - 1945-1970 | Michael Sedgwick, Mark Gillies | Bayview Books | 1993 | 1 870979 39 7 | |
| A-Z of Cars of the 1970s | Graham Robson | Bayview Books | 1994 | 1 870979 40 0 | |
| A-Z of Cars of the 1980s | Martin Lewis | Bayview Books | 1998 | 1 901432 10 6 | |
| Austin: The Counties Years | Stewart J Brown, David Whyley | Arthur Southern Ltd | 1992 | 0 946265 18 6 |
| Fiat/Bertone X1/9 | Fiat Uno | Lancia HPE | Vanden Plas Princess | Nissan Prairie |
| HOME PAGE | SITE INDEX | CONNEXIONS INDEX | AUTO-BIOGRAPHY |